eurovision if youtube were judge

So the year is 2009 and we got - youtube, iPods, iPhones, etc. Yet a singing competition known as Eurovision is "voted" exclusively by phones. I find that a bit so 1980s style.

Ok, enough my yada yada. It has been a long day for me. Anyway

How would Second Semi Final Eurovison 2009 results look like if Youtube were judge. Why I think Youtube is a good juddge

o) Majority of people have youtube access i.e. 2/3 of population (yes I know could say the same for phones). But the point is in second point;)
o) People can watch the videos on their own time and not at a very limited time frame (when the competition is aired live)
o) People will watch/listen what they like numerous times giving it deserved higher rating

The results of Youtube rankings in bold if passed to final via phone voting

Views are from the official eurovision youtube channel for the music video (no rehearsals)

AySel & Arash – Always | 870,293
Alexander Rybak – Fairytale | 531,680
Sakis Rouvas – This Is Our Night | 497,410
Svetlana Loboda – Be My Valentine | 446,804
The Toppers – Shine | 439,359
Kejsi Tola – Carry Me In Your Dreams | 342,717
Sasha Son – Love | 304,715
Nelly Ciobanu – Hora din Moldova | 245,531
Urban Symphony – Rändajad | 204,346
Niels Brinck – Believe Again | 190,429
Christina Metaxa – Firefly | 168,446
Lidia Kopania – I Don't Wanna Leave | 163,280
Marko Kon in Milan Nikolić – Cipela | 156,833
Sinead Mulvey & Black Daisy – Et Cetera | 140,238
Intars Busulis – Sastregums | 133,332
Kamil Mikulčík & Nela Pocisková – Leť tmou | 105,009
Igor Cukrov – Lijepa tena |103,469
Quartissimo feat Martina – Love Sypmhony | 98,895

I expected the results to be different i.e. that phone voting will not be the best but I guess that phone voting is not such a bad judge after all.

The only surprise here is that The Toppers – Shine with 439,359 views didn't go to the finals.